Pregnancy
You are looking at: Home : News & Gossip : Pregnancy

Parents warned against ‘souvenir’ baby scans

Pregnant mums urged to avoid by the Health Protection Agency

Posted: 3 February 2010
by Kyrsty Hazell
Parents-to-be urged to avoid 'souvenir' scans
Parents-to-be urged to avoid 'souvenir' scans

Parents-to-be should weigh up the possible risks of going for a non-essential scan just to get a photo keepsake of their baby, according to the Health Protection Agency.

While ultrasounds to check your baby’s health are entirely safe and routine, the health experts have issued concerns over what they call ‘boutique’ scans, as they believe they may cause a negative effect on your unborn baby.

The report by the HPA’s Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation have found no evidence suggesting that routine ultrasounds used in antenatal checks are harmful to unborn babies. However, it is believed that ‘souvenir’ scan beams stay static over the baby’s head for longer in order to get a sharp shot.

Although there is no concrete evidence of these scans causing health problems, the experts are advising parents to limit the scanning to medical checks only, just to be safe. “There is no established evidence of specific hazards from diagnostic exposures. However, in the light of the widespread use of ultrasounds in medical practice, its increasing commercial use for ‘souvenir’ foetal imaging, and the unconfirmed indications of possible neurological effects, there is a need for further research,” Professor Anthony Swerdlow has said

With safety issues already highlighted on home foetal heart rate monitors, it is urged not to follow the examples of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, who bought a heart monitor when Katie was pregnant with daughter Suri, and Wayne and Coleen Rooney, who had a 4D ultrasound system in their home when Coleen was expecting baby Kai.

Previous story Previous story:
Cot death: hope for blood test to identify babies at risk
Next story:Next story
MMR/autism study accepted as “false”

TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Discuss this story

we had a 4d scan with lola, it was such a lovely experience, i do hope it hasnt caused lola any issues, its a shame if it really is something we shouldnt do, the women in before me was having her 4th 4d scan for that one baby

Posted: 03/02/2010 22:33

I think they just can't be sure.I don't think there's any evidence to suggest a problem,it's just a play it safe warning.

We had a 4D scan with Merlin,the scanner was doing the normal scan and just did something with the machine and there he was all 4D ,and I have a still from that too.


Posted: 03/02/2010 22:47

ive nosed around more, and it seems the concerns are when they struggle for a good picture and spend to much time with the scanner on the babys head, and also people who have alot of them! seems like there must be some other reason for why lolas as she is!

Posted: 04/02/2010 23:09

We'd love you to add a comment! Please take half a minute to register as a free member
Click here to become a MadeForMums member and enjoy loads of other free benefits