Baby Products Association points out that rear-facing car seats can be impractical as your child grows.
The Baby Products Association (BPA) has raised issues over the use of rear-facing car seats for children up to the age of 4 in the UK. The BPA’s comments are in response to research published in the British Medical Journal last week that suggested rear-facing car seats could offer even more safety for children up to the age of 4.The BPA agrees there are arguments that travelling backwards can be safer. This, however, applies to us adults as well as children, and is also the case when you travel by other transport modes, like by train. While the BPA recommends we keep our children in rear-facing infant carriers for as long as possible, it says, “Most parents globally will eventually make the change because rearward facing child car seats are simply impractical in most situations. They take up a large amount of room in the car, usually necessitating the front seats to be moved forward, and they don’t even fit in some smaller cars.“Unless the child is given sufficient legroom, he or she will be cramped against the car’s seatback. It can be very difficult for a parent to get a larger child into such a seat and the fitting system is often very complex, increasing the chance of incorrect fitting.”The BPA’s research shows that a whooping 75% of children’s car seats are fitted incorrectly. Regardless of the direction they face, if a car seat is incorrectly fitted, your child is in danger if you have a crash. The BPA says, ““The most effective way to improve child safety in car seats is to ensure that the child is correctly fitted into the seat and the seat is correctly fitted into the car.”So what exactly is the BPA? It’s the trade association for the baby and nursery products industry, and gives baby and nursery product manufacturers and suppliers a voice. It started in 1945 and has been campaigning for child car seat safety, with support from child safety and motoring organisations, including The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (ROSPA).
The BPA is also campaigning about the safety issues of purchasing and using secondhand car seats.
I have a rear facing car seat for my two year old, which my older daughter used up until she was around 3. She stopped using it not because she got too big for it, but because my younger daughter daughter grew out of her baby carrier seat, so needed a bigger seat.
It's a Britax model which uses Isofx (also safer than a seat belt) and is not sold by Britax itself but by a specialist car seat company - Britax gave me the info for them as I had read that Britax made rear facing seats.
I read the research 3 years ago that it was safer to travel backwards, and can't belive a)it hasn't been made public sooner and b)people haven't taken any notice. I told all my friends about it but not one bought a rear facing seat. Several times people have expressed sympathy for my daughter saying 'poor thing facing backwards - she can't see anything'. in fact the opposite was true - she could see clearly out of the back window as well as the side windows unlike a forward facing seat where they are looking at the back of your seat.
What people don't understand is this is not a toddler squashed into a baby carrier - the seat is designed for that age group and is higher and larger and has leg room.
I hope more people finally wake up to the fact there is a safer way to travel!
My friend bought 2 Britax Two Way elites for her 18 month old and her 4 year old. The seats last to 25kg and she had the 18 month old rear facing and the 4 year old harnessed front facing. The other day the 4 year old had to ride in her little brother's rear facing seat... and loved it. She then refused to travel front facing so her mum had to switch her seat around. When you ask her why she wanted to travel backwards she says it's "more fun" and she can "see all the cars!"
Keeping kids rear facing IS safer. There is absolutely no doubt at all - not opting for rear facing because it is "impractical"...... poor, poor excuse! Your child's safety is anything BUT impractical, you wouldn't not use a smoke alarm because it's impractical that it goes off when you burn the toast, and you certainly would make sure you correctly fitted the baby gate - and that is massively impractical! There's nothing more frustrating than trying to get up/down the stairs with baby/laundry and having to negotiate those annoying clips! But it keeps little one safe, so we use them no questions asked - and car safety is top of my list.
However, you've got to use a rear facing car seat properly (as with any car seat, of course) and have to understand why you're buying it - it's no good just getting it because endless evidence has stated it's safer then don't fit it or use it properly! The seat is only safer when installed correctly and used correctly.
I also hate it when mum's and dad's are pressured into rear facing by rear facing advocates. They either ignore the advice bacause someone is questioning their decision or wind up feeling awful for having a front facing seat - and that helps nobody! I'd personally much prefer someone to come to me with a properly used and installed, decent quality front facing restraint!
The information needs to be made more available, big manufacturers need to be pushing safety before profit (not that that'll happen) but sites like this need to be ensuring parents are receiving unbiased, honest facts.
Personally I wouldn't use front facing, but it's each parents decision to make - I just wish there was more advice!
© Immediate Media Company Ltd 2012. This website is owned and published by Immediate Media Company Limited. www.immediatemedia.co.uk